🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."