🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils is set to be slashed by over 50%, after a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have one or more councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to elect a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required councils that had established a ward under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – most urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards suggested the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.